J and I and Me
  JAOO / Goto Conference 2010: NoSQL - an Overview (Emil Eifrem)
This talk gave a general introduction to NoSQL. Emil is CEO of Neo Technology, the company behind the Neo4j NoSQL database.

Emil started by talking about the name "NoSQL":

He gave four reasons why NoSQL is import
  1. The exponential growth in data. I did some research and actually IDC says that 2009 the amount of data grew 62% to 800 billion gigabytes (0.8 Zettabytes). 2010 we will create 1.2 Zettabyte. This is clearly exponential growth - something we should be afraid of.
  2. We are seeing more and more connected data. While we used to have tex documents it is now about hypertext, blog, user generated content etc.
  3. Also the data is more and more semi structured. User generated content is a good example again. And also we are looking for information rather by using full text search and not detailed queries.
  4. The architecture changes from integration with a common database to individual systems with their own private database each. This enables specific databases for specific challengers.

It is unlikely that relational stores will solve these problems. Also it means that NoSQL won't replace relational stores. They solve different problems and there is more than enough data for all kinds of databases.

Emil then discusses the four types of NoSQL:
  1. Key-value stores are basically globally available Maps. Examples are Project Voldemort or Tokyo Cabinet/Tyrant. Their strength are the simple data model and they are great at scaling out horizontally. However, their weakness is the simplistic data model and they are a poor fit for complex data.

  2. ColumnFamily / BigTable stores are a big table with column families i.e. you can have a lot of columns and structure them. Examples are HBase, HyperTable or Apache Cassandra.

  3. Document databases store collections of documents with a document being a key-value collection. Documents might be represented as JSON etc. Examples are CouchDB or MongoDB.
  4. Graph databases use nodes with properties and typed relationships with properties. Examples include Sones GraphDB, InfiniteGraph and Neo4j.

Challenges for NoSQL in his opinion are:

Very interesting was the demo that he did with Michael Hunger. It showed a prototype of an integration of Neo4j into Spring Roo. It showed how parts of the entity object could be stored in Neo4j and other parts in a relational store with JPA. This will probably become more and more common place: Certain parts of a customer are a good fit for a relational database while the relations to other customers or items might be a good fit for a graph database. This model allows to combine both approaches and use the better solutions for the problem at hand.

Labels: , , ,

  14:33 0 comments
Bookmark and Share
  JAOO / Goto Conference 2010: Spring Framework 3.0 On The Way To 3.1 (Jürgen Höller)
In this talk Jürgen showed the current step in the evolution of Spring i.e. the step from version 3.0 to 3.1. As most of the readers will be familiar with 3.0 I will not go into much detail concerning the first part of the talk.

Version 3.0.5 will be the last version for the 3.0 family. The first milestone for Spring 3.1 is scheduled for November - so it won't be long until you get something to play with.

Environment Specific Beans

One important feature will be environment specific beans. Applications usually run on several different environments. There is at least the Java SE environment you use for JUnit tests. You might do staging on a Tomcat server and production on a Java EE server. Beans that manage access to other system might be replaced by mocks for some of them. The goal of the environment specific beans is to deal with these differences in infrastructure while the deployment units are not changed. Usually operations insists that deployment units must not be changed between tests and production.

There are already ways to deal with this challenge. However, if this is supported as a first class part of the configuration it will be much easier and elegant to use. There are still discussions how this feature will be implemented so the details of this feature are not set
in stone.

The Spring Beans will be grouped by environment. The environment itself will be determined by an API that you can extend yourself for maximum flexibility. Placeholders will be resolved depending on the environment.

A possible syntax could be:
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource"
  <property name="driverClass" value="${database.driver}"/>
  <property name="jdbcUrl" value="${database.url}"/>
  <property name="username" value="${database.username}"/>
  <property name="password" value="${database.password}"/>

<beans profile="embedded">
  <jdbc:embedded-database id="dataSource" type="H2">
    <jdbc:script location="/WEB-INF/database/schema-member.sql"/>
    <jdbc:script location="/WEB-INF/database/schema-activity.sql"/>
    <jdbc:script location="/WEB-INF/database/schema-event.sql"/>
    <jdbc:script location="/WEB-INF/database/data.sql"/>

As you can see the beans element is reused to also cover different environments. As mentioned above the actual implementation might be different - and of course the engineers are happy if you have any feedback!

Improvements for the Java Application Configuration

Java Application Configuration with @Configuration was already introduced in Spring 3.0. In the upcoming release it will be improved to also cover a functionality that resembles the XML namespaces. These namespace are used throughout the framework to configure features like transactions or aop. As the following code sample shows one possible implementation uses a fluent API - in this case to create something that resembles <tx:annotation-driven

public void AppConfig {
  private DataSource dataSource;

  public RewardsService rewardsService() {
    return new RewardsServiceImpl(dataSource);

  public PlatformTransactionManager txManager() {
    return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource);
  public TransactionConfiguration txConfig() {
    return annotationDrivenTx().withTransactionManager(txManager());

Cache Abstraction

The Spring modules project offered some integration for caching and there is also a very basic cache abstraction. In Spring 3.1 there will be support for EhCache, GemFire, Coherence, etc. Several will be shipped with Spring core but it will also be possible to plug in custom adapters if necessary. The caching itself can then be configured using annotations for example:

public Owner loadOwner(int id);

@Cacheable(condition="name.length < 10")
public Owner loadOwner(String name);

public void deleteOwner(int id);

As you can see methods can be marked as cacheable. This can be fine tuned using SpEL (Spring Expression Language). Other methods can be marked as invalidating the cache.

Conversation Management

This feature will allow a user to handle multiple orders in a web application simultaneously - for example in several browser windows or tabs. The state of these must be isolated from one another. The HttpSession is not an option for this because windows share the same

Spring will manage the window id e.g. by using MVC session form attributes. This is a much simpler problem than the flow support in Spring Web Flow that allows for a simpler solution.

Keeping Up

Spring 3.1 will also support Servlet 3.0 on servers like Tomcat 7 or GlassFish 3. This will include the automatic registration of framework listeners which will make it even easier to use Spring in these settings. Also the support for JSF 2.0 will be improved e.g. for conversations.

Sum Up

Spring 3.1 optimizes Spring in several ways. As the version number indicated polishing and improvements are the main subjects. In particular the cache abstraction is interesting as nowadays a lot of applications need this kind of feature to build scalable solutions.

Labels: , ,

  10:19 0 comments
Bookmark and Share
  Spring vs. Java EE and Why I Don't Care
Disclaimer: I work for VMware / SpringSource. That means I might be biased - but then again we did not just create Spring. We are also a member of the Java EE 6 Expert Group. The views are my personal view of course.


Spring has established itself as a very popular solution for Enterprise Java applications. In particular the advantages of Spring as compared EJB 1.x / 2.x were very obvious and were a major reason for Spring's success.

The Current State

Due to Spring’s early success and adoption, Java EE 5 and Java EE 6 were pushed to greatly simplify the Java EE programming model, increase developer productivity and become much simpler to use than previous versions. The current Java EE 6 solutions are thus just now achieving the ability to compete against Spring's programming model. Developers now are ready to ask the question "Why you would prefer Spring?" Here is my take:

Before we start a flame war and get lost in technical details let me reiterate: Java EE and Spring can have a similar programming model. Spring is more flexible and I would prefer it. But: I don't think your project will fail because of the decision you made concerning this. And: I think a Java EE vs. Spring shoot out will be boring. If you do a side by side comparison you will end up with minor differences such as @Component instead of @Stateless or whether you will need to deploy some additional JARs. While that might be impressive in a demo I don't believe this will convince anyone to use one platform or the other. Certain features of Spring (e.g. the flexibility to use XML or Java based configuration) will probably not be shown as they just cannot be done using Java EE.

Why I don't care

So if a side by side comparison doesn't make a lot of sense - why would I choose Spring? There has to be a clear advantage somewhere to definitely answer this question. A personal note at this point: I am frequently work at a shared office space with some JavaScript and Ruby on Rails guys - I am the only Java guy there (and sometimes I think they pity me). After talking a lot with these other developers, I believe we need a compelling Java story that can live up to their developer experience. If Java EE and Spring are both on a comparable level concerning productivity we need to come up with novel ideas to improve. Looking at Ruby on Rails helps here - the approach is to combine a dynamic language with a powerful framework and a code generator. The next level of productivity is not Java EE vs. Spring. It must be something that can counter the productivity of Ruby on Rails. I believe this is:

So if you look at productivity the comparision should not be "Java EE vs. Spring" but rather "Groovy / Grails vs. Spring Roo vs. Ruby on Rails". Better productivity is not gained on the level of the framework or the programming model any more.

Asking the Wrong Question

The other reason why I think "Spring vs. Java EE" is the wrong question is: Both models on their own do not solve the challenges I typically see in projects. Let me give you some examples:

So there are a lot of challenges Java EE just has no solution for. A side by side comparison of Spring and Java EE might lure you to believe that JSF + Spring / Java EE + database is all you will ever need. Look at your projects and decide for yourself if that is true. It certainly contradicts my experience.

Sum Up

To cut a long story short:

...and a last thing

So you have read this blog post to the end. That is great - thanks a lot! Please don't start a religious battle now. Instead code something or do something fun. Enjoy!

Labels: , ,

  10:42 38 comments
Bookmark and Share
  Spring at the WJAX
Spring will once again be broadly covered at WJAX:

Look at http://jax.de/wjax2010/ for more details. WJAX is a great conference - looking forward to meet you there!

Labels: ,

  15:44 0 comments
Bookmark and Share
J for Java | I for Internet, iMac, iPod and iPad | Me for me

Juni 2005 / Juli 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / Oktober 2005 / November 2005 / Dezember 2005 / Januar 2006 / Februar 2006 / März 2006 / April 2006 / Mai 2006 / Juni 2006 / Juli 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / Oktober 2006 / November 2006 / Dezember 2006 / Januar 2007 / Februar 2007 / März 2007 / April 2007 / Mai 2007 / Juni 2007 / Juli 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / Oktober 2007 / November 2007 / Dezember 2007 / Januar 2008 / April 2008 / Mai 2008 / Juni 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / November 2008 / Januar 2009 / Februar 2009 / März 2009 / April 2009 / Mai 2009 / Juni 2009 / Juli 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / Oktober 2009 / November 2009 / Dezember 2009 / Januar 2010 / Februar 2010 / März 2010 / April 2010 / Mai 2010 / Juli 2010 / August 2010 / Oktober 2010 / Januar 2011 / Februar 2011 / März 2011 / April 2011 / Mai 2011 / Juni 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / November 2011 / Februar 2012 / April 2012 / Mai 2012 / April 2013 / Mai 2013 / Juni 2013 / Januar 2015 / Juli 2015 / Februar 2016 /


Google +
Das Spring Buch



Betreiber und Kontakt:
Eberhard Wolff
Leobschützer Strasse 22
13125 Berlin
E-Mail-Adresse: eberhard.wolff@gmail.com

Verantwortlich für journalistisch-redaktionelle Inhalte:
Eberhard Wolff